Head to head · tested 27 Oct 2026

Qwen3.8 27B vs Qwen3 Coder Next: accuracy, speed and price

Similar accuracy; Qwen3 Coder Next costs less per question.

QwenQwen3.8 27B63.8% score · #34$0.0043 per question49 tok/sQwenQwen3 Coder Next62.5% score · #36$0.0017 per question106 tok/s

Verdict

Built from the measurements below

  • Accuracy is too close to call: Qwen3.8 27B scored 63.8% and Qwen3 Coder Next 62.5% on the same 80 questions, a gap within what chance alone could produce.
  • Qwen3 Coder Next is 2.6× cheaper per question as billed ($0.0017 vs $0.0043), reasoning tokens included.
  • Qwen3 Coder Next generates text 2.2× faster: 106 tokens per second against 49.
  • Qwen3 Coder Next starts answering sooner: 0.4 s to the first token, against 0.5 s for Qwen3.8 27B.
  • Qwen3.8 27B accepts more context: 1M tokens against 262k.

Which should you choose?

Choose Qwen3.8 27B for a 1M-token context window and more hosts to choose from on OpenRouter (21 against 1). Choose Qwen3 Coder Next for the lower cost per correct answer ($0.0027 against $0.0067), faster streaming and a quicker first token.

Accuracy gap +1.2 points (z = 0.16). A winner is called only when z is at least 1.96, the usual 95% threshold. Speed, latency and price need a 10% margin.

Head to head

Same questions, same prompt, same API

MeasureQwen3.8 27BQwen3 Coder NextEdge
Verification scoreHigher is better63.8%62.5%Too close to call
Cost per questionLower is better$0.0043$0.0017Qwen3 Coder Next
Output speedHigher is better49106Qwen3 Coder Next
Time to first tokenLower is better0.5 s0.4 sQwen3 Coder Next
End-to-end response timeLower is better10.6 s4.2 sQwen3 Coder Next
Tokens per questionLower is better1,9132,059Similar
Context windowHigher is better1M262kQwen3.8 27B

Side by side

Bars are scaled to the larger of the two values. The winner on each measure is marked in bold.

Every measure

Qwen3.8 27B first, Qwen3 Coder Next second

Verification scorehigher is better
Qwen3.8 27B63.8%
Qwen3 Coder Next62.5%
Cost per questionlower is better
Qwen3.8 27B$0.0043
Qwen3 Coder Next$0.0017
Output speedhigher is better
Qwen3.8 27B49
Qwen3 Coder Next106
Time to first tokenlower is better
Qwen3.8 27B0.5 s
Qwen3 Coder Next0.4 s
End-to-end response timelower is better
Qwen3.8 27B10.6 s
Qwen3 Coder Next4.2 s
Tokens per questionlower is better
Qwen3.8 27B1,913
Qwen3 Coder Next2,059
Context windowhigher is better
Qwen3.8 27B1M
Qwen3 Coder Next262k

Score vs. cost per question

Both models in color, every other model in grey

Most attractive quadrant0255075100$0.00001$0.0001$0.001$0.01$0.10Cost per question (USD, log) →Verification score (%) →Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BCommand AReka Flash 3Gemma 4 26B A4BGemma 4 31BQwen3.5 397B A17BHermes 4 405BMuse WonderGrok 4.7o3gpt-oss-20bMinistral 3 3B 2512Nova Micro 1.0Phi 4Granite 4.2 8BHy3GLM 5.3 FlashSolar Pro 4Trinity Large ThinkingMiniMax M3Mistral Large 4Claude Opus 5.5GPT-6.1 SolGemini 4 ArgonGPT-5.4GPT-6 Lunagpt-oss-120bLlama 4 Maverick

Specifications and pricing

From OpenRouter's catalogue, plus the leaderboard's test dates

SpecificationQwen3.8 27BQwen3 Coder Next
CreatorQwenQwen
Released14 Aug 20264 Feb 2026
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReasoningYesNo
Inputtext, image, videotext
Outputtexttext
Context window1M tokens262k tokens
Knowledge cutoff——
List price in / out per 1M$0.2 / $2.5$0.12 / $0.8
Blended price per 1M (3:1)$0.78$0.29
Cheapest hostTenstorrent · $0.06 / $0.5Parasail · $0.12 / $0.8
Hosts on OpenRouter211
Last tested26 Oct 202626 Oct 2026

Compare any two models →

Qwen3.8 27B vs Qwen3 Coder Next: frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.8 27B better than Qwen3 Coder Next?
On accuracy they are statistically tied: Qwen3.8 27B scored 63.8% and Qwen3 Coder Next 62.5% on the same 80 questions from open datasets. Similar accuracy; Qwen3 Coder Next costs less per question.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 27B or Qwen3 Coder Next?
Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper: $0.0017 per question as billed, against $0.0043. List prices: Qwen3.8 27B $0.2 in / $2.5 out, Qwen3 Coder Next $0.12 in / $0.8 out per million tokens.
Which is faster, Qwen3.8 27B or Qwen3 Coder Next?
Qwen3 Coder Next is faster at 106 output tokens per second, against 49. Time to first token: 0.5 s for Qwen3.8 27B, 0.4 s for Qwen3 Coder Next.
Which has the larger context window, Qwen3.8 27B or Qwen3 Coder Next?
Qwen3.8 27B, with 1M tokens against 262k.