ResearchLLM Verifications Leaderboard

Data as of · 78 models, 80 questions · reviewed by Suhas Bhairav · methodology

Head to head · tested 27 Oct 2026

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs Muse Wonder: accuracy, speed and price

Muse Wonder is more accurate; Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is cheaper.

MetaLlama 3.3 70B Instruct42.5% score · #52$0.00053 per question42 tok/sMetaMuse Wonder78.8% score · #7$0.021 per question175 tok/s

Verdict

Built from the measurements below

  • Muse Wonder is more accurate: 78.8% against 42.5% on the same 80 questions, a 36.3-point gap that is statistically significant.
  • Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is 40× cheaper per question as billed ($0.00053 vs $0.021), reasoning tokens included.
  • Muse Wonder generates text 4.2× faster: 175 tokens per second against 42.
  • Llama 3.3 70B Instruct starts answering sooner: 0.7 s to the first token, against 16.1 s for Muse Wonder.
  • Muse Wonder accepts more context: 1M tokens against 131k.

Which should you choose?

Choose Llama 3.3 70B Instruct for the lower cost per correct answer ($0.0013 against $0.027), a quicker first token, open weights you can run yourself and more hosts to choose from on OpenRouter (9 against 1). Choose Muse Wonder for the most accurate answers of the two, faster streaming and a 1M-token context window. The widest subject gap is in engineering: Muse Wonder answered 11 of 15 correctly, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct 2 of 15. With so few questions per subject, treat this as a lead to test on your own prompts, not a result.

Accuracy gap -36.3 points (z = -4.69). A winner is called only when z is at least 1.96, the usual 95% threshold. Speed, latency and price need a 10% margin.

Head to head

Same questions, same prompt, same API

MeasureLlama 3.3 70B InstructMuse WonderEdge
Verification scoreHigher is better42.5%78.8%Muse Wonder
Cost per questionLower is better$0.00053$0.021Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Output speedHigher is better42175Muse Wonder
Time to first tokenLower is better0.7 s16.1 sLlama 3.3 70B Instruct
End-to-end response timeLower is better8.8 s20.8 sLlama 3.3 70B Instruct
Tokens per questionLower is better8551,014Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Context windowHigher is better131k1MMuse Wonder

Side by side

Bars are scaled to the larger of the two values. The winner on each measure is marked in bold.

Every measure

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct first, Muse Wonder second

Verification scorehigher is better
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct42.5%
Muse Wonder78.8%
Cost per questionlower is better
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct$0.00053
Muse Wonder$0.021
Output speedhigher is better
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct42
Muse Wonder175
Time to first tokenlower is better
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct0.7 s
Muse Wonder16.1 s
End-to-end response timelower is better
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct8.8 s
Muse Wonder20.8 s
Tokens per questionlower is better
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct855
Muse Wonder1,014
Context windowhigher is better
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct131k
Muse Wonder1M

Score vs. cost per question

Both models in color, every other model in grey

Most attractive quadrant0255075100$0.00001$0.0001$0.001$0.01$0.10Cost per question (USD, log) →Verification score (%) →Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BCommand AReka Flash 3Gemma 4 26B A4BGemma 4 31BQwen3.5 397B A17BHermes 4 405BMuse WonderGrok 4.7o3gpt-oss-20bMinistral 3 3B 2512Nova Micro 1.0Phi 4Granite 4.2 8BHy3GLM 5.3 FlashSolar Pro 4Trinity Large ThinkingMiniMax M3Mistral Large 4Claude Opus 5.5GPT-6.1 SolGemini 4 ArgonGPT-5.4GPT-6 Lunagpt-oss-120bLlama 4 Maverick

Specifications and pricing

From OpenRouter's catalogue, plus the leaderboard's test dates

SpecificationLlama 3.3 70B InstructMuse Wonder
CreatorMetaMeta
Released6 Dec 202412 Oct 2026
WeightsOpen weights—
ReasoningNoYes
Inputtexttext, image, video, file, audio
Outputtexttext
Context window131k tokens1M tokens
Knowledge cutoff31 Dec 2023—
List price in / out per 1M$0.1 / $0.32$4 / $20
Blended price per 1M (3:1)$0.16$8.00
Cheapest hostDeepInfra · $0.1 / $0.32Meta · $4 / $20
Hosts on OpenRouter91
Last tested26 Oct 202627 Oct 2026

Compare any two models →

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs Muse Wonder: frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.3 70B Instruct better than Muse Wonder?
Muse Wonder is more accurate: it answered 63 of 80 questions correctly (78.8%) against 34 of 80 (42.5%) for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct. Muse Wonder is more accurate; Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is cheaper.
Which is cheaper, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct or Muse Wonder?
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is cheaper: $0.00053 per question as billed, against $0.021. List prices: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct $0.1 in / $0.32 out, Muse Wonder $4 in / $20 out per million tokens.
Which is faster, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct or Muse Wonder?
Muse Wonder is faster at 175 output tokens per second, against 42. Time to first token: 0.7 s for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct, 16.1 s for Muse Wonder.
Which has the larger context window, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct or Muse Wonder?
Muse Wonder, with 1M tokens against 131k.