Head to head · tested 27 Oct 2026

Grok 4.7 vs Muse Wonder: accuracy, speed and price

Similar accuracy; Muse Wonder costs less per question.

SpaceXAIGrok 4.780.0% score · #6$0.025 per question77 tok/sMetaMuse Wonder78.8% score · #7$0.021 per question175 tok/s

Verdict

Built from the measurements below

  • Accuracy is too close to call: Grok 4.7 scored 80.0% and Muse Wonder 78.8% on the same 80 questions, a gap within what chance alone could produce.
  • Muse Wonder is 1.2× cheaper per question as billed ($0.021 vs $0.025), reasoning tokens included.
  • Muse Wonder generates text 2.3× faster: 175 tokens per second against 77.
  • Grok 4.7 starts answering sooner: 1.9 s to the first token, against 16.1 s for Muse Wonder.
  • Muse Wonder accepts more context: 1M tokens against 500k.

Which should you choose?

Choose Grok 4.7 for a quicker first token. Choose Muse Wonder for the lower cost per correct answer ($0.027 against $0.031), faster streaming, shorter outputs (about 1,014 tokens per question against 3,952) and a 1M-token context window.

Accuracy gap +1.3 points (z = 0.20). A winner is called only when z is at least 1.96, the usual 95% threshold. Speed, latency and price need a 10% margin.

Head to head

Same questions, same prompt, same API

MeasureGrok 4.7Muse WonderEdge
Verification scoreHigher is better80.0%78.8%Too close to call
Cost per questionLower is better$0.025$0.021Muse Wonder
Output speedHigher is better77175Muse Wonder
Time to first tokenLower is better1.9 s16.1 sGrok 4.7
End-to-end response timeLower is better8.0 s20.8 sGrok 4.7
Tokens per questionLower is better3,9521,014Muse Wonder
Context windowHigher is better500k1MMuse Wonder

Side by side

Bars are scaled to the larger of the two values. The winner on each measure is marked in bold.

Every measure

Grok 4.7 first, Muse Wonder second

Verification scorehigher is better
Grok 4.780.0%
Muse Wonder78.8%
Cost per questionlower is better
Grok 4.7$0.025
Muse Wonder$0.021
Output speedhigher is better
Grok 4.777
Muse Wonder175
Time to first tokenlower is better
Grok 4.71.9 s
Muse Wonder16.1 s
End-to-end response timelower is better
Grok 4.78.0 s
Muse Wonder20.8 s
Tokens per questionlower is better
Grok 4.73,952
Muse Wonder1,014
Context windowhigher is better
Grok 4.7500k
Muse Wonder1M

Score vs. cost per question

Both models in color, every other model in grey

Most attractive quadrant0255075100$0.00001$0.0001$0.001$0.01$0.10Cost per question (USD, log) →Verification score (%) →Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BCommand AReka Flash 3Gemma 4 26B A4BGemma 4 31BQwen3.5 397B A17BHermes 4 405BMuse WonderGrok 4.7o3gpt-oss-20bMinistral 3 3B 2512Nova Micro 1.0Phi 4Granite 4.2 8BHy3GLM 5.3 FlashSolar Pro 4Trinity Large ThinkingMiniMax M3Mistral Large 4Claude Opus 5.5GPT-6.1 SolGemini 4 ArgonGPT-5.4GPT-6 Lunagpt-oss-120bLlama 4 Maverick

Specifications and pricing

From OpenRouter's catalogue, plus the leaderboard's test dates

SpecificationGrok 4.7Muse Wonder
CreatorSpaceXAIMeta
Released21 Sept 202612 Oct 2026
Weights——
ReasoningYesYes
Inputtext, image, filetext, image, video, file, audio
Outputtexttext
Context window500k tokens1M tokens
Knowledge cutoff——
List price in / out per 1M$2 / $6$4 / $20
Blended price per 1M (3:1)$3.00$8.00
Cheapest hostxAI · $2 / $6Meta · $4 / $20
Hosts on OpenRouter11
Last tested27 Oct 202627 Oct 2026

Compare any two models →

Grok 4.7 vs Muse Wonder: frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.7 better than Muse Wonder?
On accuracy they are statistically tied: Grok 4.7 scored 80.0% and Muse Wonder 78.8% on the same 80 questions from open datasets. Similar accuracy; Muse Wonder costs less per question.
Which is cheaper, Grok 4.7 or Muse Wonder?
Muse Wonder is cheaper: $0.021 per question as billed, against $0.025. List prices: Grok 4.7 $2 in / $6 out, Muse Wonder $4 in / $20 out per million tokens.
Which is faster, Grok 4.7 or Muse Wonder?
Muse Wonder is faster at 175 output tokens per second, against 77. Time to first token: 1.9 s for Grok 4.7, 16.1 s for Muse Wonder.
Which has the larger context window, Grok 4.7 or Muse Wonder?
Muse Wonder, with 1M tokens against 500k.