Head to head · tested 27 Oct 2026

gpt-oss-120b vs Hy3: accuracy, speed and price

Similar accuracy; gpt-oss-120b costs less per question.

OpenAIgpt-oss-120b58.8% score · #41$0.00013 per question82 tok/sTencentHy358.8% score · #41$0.0012 per question96 tok/s

Verdict

Built from the measurements below

  • Accuracy is too close to call: gpt-oss-120b scored 58.8% and Hy3 58.8% on the same 80 questions, a gap within what chance alone could produce.
  • gpt-oss-120b is 9.8× cheaper per question as billed ($0.00013 vs $0.0012), reasoning tokens included.
  • Hy3 generates text 1.2× faster: 96 tokens per second against 82.
  • gpt-oss-120b starts answering sooner: 0.5 s to the first token, against 1.7 s for Hy3.
  • Hy3 accepts more context: 262k tokens against 131k.

Which should you choose?

Choose gpt-oss-120b for the lower cost per correct answer ($0.00021 against $0.0021), a quicker first token, shorter outputs (about 546 tokens per question against 2,355) and more hosts to choose from on OpenRouter (23 against 5). Choose Hy3 for faster streaming and a 262k-token context window. The widest subject gap is in law: Hy3 answered 4 of 6 correctly, gpt-oss-120b 1 of 6. With so few questions per subject, treat this as a lead to test on your own prompts, not a result.

Accuracy gap +0.0 points (z = 0.00). A winner is called only when z is at least 1.96, the usual 95% threshold. Speed, latency and price need a 10% margin.

Head to head

Same questions, same prompt, same API

Measuregpt-oss-120bHy3Edge
Verification scoreHigher is better58.8%58.8%Too close to call
Cost per questionLower is better$0.00013$0.0012gpt-oss-120b
Output speedHigher is better8296Hy3
Time to first tokenLower is better0.5 s1.7 sgpt-oss-120b
End-to-end response timeLower is better5.4 s9.0 sgpt-oss-120b
Tokens per questionLower is better5462,355gpt-oss-120b
Context windowHigher is better131k262kHy3

Side by side

Bars are scaled to the larger of the two values. The winner on each measure is marked in bold.

Every measure

gpt-oss-120b first, Hy3 second

Verification scorehigher is better
gpt-oss-120b58.8%
Hy358.8%
Cost per questionlower is better
gpt-oss-120b$0.00013
Hy3$0.0012
Output speedhigher is better
gpt-oss-120b82
Hy396
Time to first tokenlower is better
gpt-oss-120b0.5 s
Hy31.7 s
End-to-end response timelower is better
gpt-oss-120b5.4 s
Hy39.0 s
Tokens per questionlower is better
gpt-oss-120b546
Hy32,355
Context windowhigher is better
gpt-oss-120b131k
Hy3262k

Score vs. cost per question

Both models in color, every other model in grey

Most attractive quadrant0255075100$0.00001$0.0001$0.001$0.01$0.10Cost per question (USD, log) →Verification score (%) →Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BCommand AReka Flash 3Gemma 4 26B A4BGemma 4 31BQwen3.5 397B A17BHermes 4 405BMuse WonderGrok 4.7o3gpt-oss-20bMinistral 3 3B 2512Nova Micro 1.0Phi 4Granite 4.2 8BHy3GLM 5.3 FlashSolar Pro 4Trinity Large ThinkingMiniMax M3Mistral Large 4Claude Opus 5.5GPT-6.1 SolGemini 4 ArgonGPT-5.4GPT-6 Lunagpt-oss-120bLlama 4 Maverick

Specifications and pricing

From OpenRouter's catalogue, plus the leaderboard's test dates

Specificationgpt-oss-120bHy3
CreatorOpenAITencent
Released5 Aug 20256 Jul 2026
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReasoningYesYes
Inputtexttext
Outputtexttext
Context window131k tokens262k tokens
Knowledge cutoff30 Jun 2024—
List price in / out per 1M$0.15 / $0.6$0.132 / $0.528
Blended price per 1M (3:1)$0.26$0.23
Cheapest hostNear AI · $0.03 / $0.15Tencent · $0.0825 / $0.33
Hosts on OpenRouter235
Last tested25 Oct 202626 Oct 2026

Compare any two models →

gpt-oss-120b vs Hy3: frequently asked questions

Is gpt-oss-120b better than Hy3?
On accuracy they are statistically tied: gpt-oss-120b scored 58.8% and Hy3 58.8% on the same 80 questions from open datasets. Similar accuracy; gpt-oss-120b costs less per question.
Which is cheaper, gpt-oss-120b or Hy3?
gpt-oss-120b is cheaper: $0.00013 per question as billed, against $0.0012. List prices: gpt-oss-120b $0.15 in / $0.6 out, Hy3 $0.132 in / $0.528 out per million tokens.
Which is faster, gpt-oss-120b or Hy3?
Hy3 is faster at 96 output tokens per second, against 82. Time to first token: 0.5 s for gpt-oss-120b, 1.7 s for Hy3.
Which has the larger context window, gpt-oss-120b or Hy3?
Hy3, with 262k tokens against 131k.