Cursor Rules Template: Multi-Agent Customer Support with Cursor AI
Cursor Rules Template for a multi-agent customer support system with ticket triage, knowledge retrieval, escalation, and QA review using Cursor AI.
Target User
Developers building a multi-agent customer support system with Cursor AI
Use Cases
- Ticket triage
- Knowledge retrieval
- Agent escalation
- QA review workflow
- Security and audit
Markdown Template
Cursor Rules Template: Multi-Agent Customer Support with Cursor AI
framework: python-fastapi
context: |
You are the orchestrator for a multi-agent customer support system using Cursor AI.
You coordinate four agents: TicketTriageAgent, KnowledgeRetrieverAgent, EscalationAgent, and QAReviewAgent.
You must produce structured outputs for downstream systems and respect security, data privacy, and auditability.
roles:
- name: TicketTriageAgent
goals:
- Assess incoming tickets for intent and urgency
- Classify topic (billing, tech support, account)
- Route to knowledge base or escalate to human
- name: KnowledgeRetrieverAgent
goals:
- Query PostgreSQL knowledge_base with semantic search
- Return ranked articles with sources and confidence
- Respect access control and content freshness
- name: EscalationAgent
goals:
- Determine when to escalate to human agents
- Queue tickets with priority and SLAs
- Notify appropriate humans and logs
- name: QAReviewAgent
goals:
- Review outputs for quality and accuracy
- Flag hallucinations and propose corrections
- Log QA findings for CI/CD
style:
- language: python
- standard: PEP8
- docstrings: required
- typing: strict
architecture:
- root: /app
- modules:
- agents/
- pipelines/
- models/
- routes/
- config/
- dependencies:
- fastapi
- sqlalchemy
- asyncpg
- pydantic
security:
- authentication: OAuth2 with JWT
- encryption: TLS in transit, at-rest encryption for DB
- secrets: use environment variables and secret manager
- auditing: enable request/response logging with redaction
database_orm:
- orm: SQLAlchemy
- db: PostgreSQL
- knowledgeStore: PostgreSQL
testing:
- unitTests: pytest
- integrationTests: pytest-asyncio
- linting: pre-commit, flake8, isort
- ci: github-actions
antiPatterns:
- Do not expose admin endpoints to public networks
- Do not log secrets or tokens
- Do not perform unbounded recursive calls
- Do not bypass authentication checks
- Do not mix business logic with API controller codeOverview
Summary: This Cursor Rules Template configures a multi-agent customer support workflow for Cursor AI on a Python FastAPI stack with PostgreSQL, Redis, and OpenAI capabilities. It provides a clear orchestration between a TicketTriageAgent, KnowledgeRetrieverAgent, EscalationAgent, and QAReviewAgent. The goal is reliable ticket triage, accurate knowledge retrieval, safe escalation, and QA oversight with auditable outputs.
The Cursor rules configuration is designed to be copy-pasteable into a project root as a .cursorrules file. It defines roles, data contracts, and guardrails so the AI behaves predictably in production.
When to Use These Cursor Rules
- When building a customer support system that coordinates multiple agent roles (triage, retrieval, escalation, QA).
- When you need reproducible outputs with structured JSON and traceable decisions for every ticket.
- When using a Python FastAPI stack with PostgreSQL for ticket data and knowledge_base, plus Redis queues for asynchronous tasks.
- When you require strict security, auditing, and safe AI behaviors to avoid hallucinations and data leakage.
- When you want CI/CD-friendly testing and linting workflows with pytest and pre-commit tooling.
Copyable .cursorrules Configuration
framework: python-fastapi
context: |
You are the orchestrator for a multi-agent customer support system using Cursor AI.
You coordinate four agents: TicketTriageAgent, KnowledgeRetrieverAgent, EscalationAgent, and QAReviewAgent.
You must produce structured outputs for downstream systems and respect security, data privacy, and auditability.
roles:
- name: TicketTriageAgent
goals:
- Assess incoming tickets for intent and urgency
- Classify topic (billing, tech support, account)
- Route to knowledge base or escalate to human
- name: KnowledgeRetrieverAgent
goals:
- Query PostgreSQL knowledge_base with semantic search
- Return ranked articles with sources and confidence
- Respect access control and content freshness
- name: EscalationAgent
goals:
- Determine when to escalate to human agents
- Queue tickets with priority and SLAs
- Notify appropriate humans and logs
- name: QAReviewAgent
goals:
- Review outputs for quality and accuracy
- Flag hallucinations and propose corrections
- Log QA findings for CI/CD
style:
- language: python
- standard: PEP8
- docstrings: required
- typing: strict
architecture:
- root: /app
- modules:
- agents/
- pipelines/
- models/
- routes/
- config/
- dependencies:
- fastapi
- sqlalchemy
- asyncpg
- pydantic
security:
- authentication: OAuth2 with JWT
- encryption: TLS in transit, at-rest encryption for DB
- secrets: use environment variables and secret manager
- auditing: enable request/response logging with redaction
database_orm:
- orm: SQLAlchemy
- db: PostgreSQL
- knowledgeStore: PostgreSQL
testing:
- unitTests: pytest
- integrationTests: pytest-asyncio
- linting: pre-commit, flake8, isort
- ci: github-actions
antiPatterns:
- Do not expose admin endpoints to public networks
- Do not log secrets or tokens
- Do not perform unbounded recursive calls
- Do not bypass authentication checks
- Do not mix business logic with API controller code
Recommended Project Structure
project/
├── app/
│ ├── agents/
│ │ ├── ticket_triage.py
│ │ ├── knowledge_retriever.py
│ │ ├── escalation.py
│ │ └── qa_review.py
│ ├── models/
│ │ ├── ticket.py
│ │ ├── knowledge_base.py
│ │ ├── user.py
│ │ └── agent_log.py
│ ├── pipelines/
│ │ ├── triage_pipeline.py
│ │ ├── retrieval_pipeline.py
│ │ └── escalation_pipeline.py
│ ├── api/
│ │ ├── main.py
│ │ └── routes/
│ │ └── tickets.py
│ ├── config/
│ │ └── settings.py
│ └── tests/
│ ├── test_ticket.py
│ └── test_qa.py
├── docker-compose.yml
└── requirements.txt
Core Engineering Principles
- Single-responsibility agents with clear interfaces
- Idempotent task processing and deterministic output contracts
- Explicit data contracts for messages, tickets, and knowledge responses
- End-to-end observability: traces, logs, metrics for each ticket
- Security by design: least privilege, audit trails, and secret management
- Testable: unit, integration, and end-to-end tests before deployment
- Config-driven behavior with safe defaults and predictable overrides
- Fail-fast and safe fallback paths for partial failures
Code Construction Rules
- Use Python 3.11+ with FastAPI as the web layer and SQLAlchemy for ORM
- Define Pydantic models for all inputs/outputs and enforce strict typing
- All AI prompts should be assembled from small, tested templates and versioned
- Keep knowledge_base interactions read-only for non-admin agents unless explicitly allowed
- Avoid global mutable state; use dependency injection and scoped sessions
- Do not perform raw SQL strings with user input; use parameterized queries
- All code paths must be asynchronous where IO-bound and supported by a task queue
- Document APIs and agent contracts with in-code docstrings and comments
- Do not bypass authentication for any route that touches tickets or knowledge
Security and Production Rules
- Enforce OAuth2 with short-lived JWTs for all agent requests
- Encrypt data at rest and in transit; rotate DB credentials regularly
- Audit all ticket decisions and knowledge fetches with immutable logs
- Implement RBAC: agents have scoped permissions; humans have broader access
- Validate inputs strictly; sanitize outputs from LLMs before storage or display
- Rate-limit external calls and monitor for abuse patterns
- Use feature flags to disable experimental behaviors in prod
Testing Checklist
- Unit tests for each agent function and data model
- Integration tests for ticket flow across triage, retrieval, escalation, and QA
- End-to-end tests simulating real tickets and KB lookups
- Static analysis: type checks, lint, and import sorting
- CI/CD: run tests, lint, and security checks on PR
- QA review of AI outputs in a staging environment
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- Overloading a single agent with too many responsibilities
- Hard-coding prompts or secrets in code or policies
- Unbounded retries or looped prompts causing runaway costs
- Skipping authentication for endpoints touching tickets and knowledge
- Ignoring data privacy when logging or auditing AI outputs
Related Cursor rules templates
Explore adjacent Cursor rules templates for similar stacks, workflows, and production constraints.
- SOC Alert Triage Cursor Rules Template
- Cursor Rules Template: GitHub PR Analysis, Security Checks, Test Suggestions, and Summary Comments
- Cursor Rules Template: Property Management SaaS Stack
- Cursor Rules Template: SOC 2 Cybersecurity Compliance Dashboard (FastAPI + PostgreSQL)
FAQ
What is a Cursor Rules Template for a multi-agent customer support system?
A Cursor Rules Template defines a structured, copyable set of Cursor AI instructions to coordinate multiple agents—here TicketTriageAgent, KnowledgeRetrieverAgent, EscalationAgent, and QAReviewAgent—for ticket triage, knowledge retrieval, escalation, and QA review within a Python/FastAPI stack.
Which stack targets this template?
This template targets a Python FastAPI stack with PostgreSQL for data storage, Redis for task queuing, and OpenAI-based Cursor AI prompts to orchestrate agents with clear data contracts and security guardrails.
How do I integrate knowledge retrieval into the pipeline?
How is escalation and QA review handled?
EscalationAgent decides when to involve humans based on ticket urgency and SLAs, while QAReviewAgent inspects outputs for accuracy, flags hallucinations, and logs findings for CI/CD improvements.
What are the security considerations?
Use OAuth2 with JWTs, TLS in transit, at-rest encryption, restricted permissions, and full audit logs. Never log secrets and ensure outputs from AI are sanitized before storage or display.